This headline from the Denver Business Journal is bittersweet. On one hand, kudos to Xcel for meeting Colorado's renewable portfolio standard (basically 30% renewables by 2020) approximately eight years early. It's an incredible feat and Xcel should be commended for working diligently and creatively to meet that goal. On the other hand, the momentum towards accomplishing this goal will inevitably begin to decline. This suggests that utility incentives for homeowners to install solar PV or solar thermal may begin to dwindle. Funding for wind turbine farms on the Eastern plains may begin to dwindle. And perhaps even incentives for energy efficiency measures may dwindle. Of course the renewable energy market has to begin standing on its own, however the great state of Colorado can't just take it easy and feel good about having already accomplished 30% by 2020.
Even though there may not be any political appetite in this "age of austerity" for increasing the state renewable portfolio standard (RPS), I think that since Xcel was able to acquire the RPS goal that quickly, it's time for Xcel, Governor Hickenlooper, the state legislature, and environmental groups to work towards increasing the state RPS to oh let's say 40% by 2025 for investor owned utilities and 20% for co-ops and municipal owned. I think that goal would set the pace for the country and demonstrate that Colorado is the renewable energy powerhouse it was always meant to be. Once you've accomplished a goal, isn't it time to set a new one? Just sayin'.
If anything, I sure do miss ex-Governor Ritter's ability to develop those unique coalitions of strange bedfellows right about now. Alas, let's see if Governor Hickelooper can govern as effectively. What say you kind readers?
Saturday, May 14, 2011
Xcel Energy Says It’s Close to Meeting Colorado Target for Renewable Energy
Labels:
Colorado,
good debate,
RPS,
utilities
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wishful Thinking
*Before adding PV, wind, or solar thermal to your residential or commercial structure, the first step is to analyze this structure's energy consumption through a professional energy audit. I'd like to see some public education on the importance of an energy audit for any structure. Remember Smokey the Bear's forest fire shtick drilled into our heads over the last few decades? How about something like, "Henry the House" desperately wanting to know how much energy he consumes and wastes throughout the day?
*With over 300 sunny days a year on the Front Range is it too much to ask for solar PV and thermal modules on every residential and commercial unit (after an energy audit of course)?
*How about affordable plug-in electric cars that go more than 100 miles on a charge with PV and wind powered recharging stations?
*Dreaming of companies large and small adopting business sustainability practices to maximize profits, reduce their carbon footprint, and enhance the lives of their employees and the communities that surround them.
*With over 300 sunny days a year on the Front Range is it too much to ask for solar PV and thermal modules on every residential and commercial unit (after an energy audit of course)?
*How about affordable plug-in electric cars that go more than 100 miles on a charge with PV and wind powered recharging stations?
*Dreaming of companies large and small adopting business sustainability practices to maximize profits, reduce their carbon footprint, and enhance the lives of their employees and the communities that surround them.
Labels
Abengoa Solar
(1)
Al Gore
(3)
algae
(3)
Amory Lovins
(3)
anniversary post
(1)
Arnold Goldman
(1)
ASES
(1)
automobile
(6)
award
(3)
bacteria
(1)
bad policy
(2)
base load
(4)
battery
(4)
beer
(6)
behavior change
(2)
Berkeley
(1)
bicycle
(1)
big business
(9)
big oil
(15)
biofuels
(39)
biomass
(3)
biomimicry
(1)
BLM
(2)
building efficiency
(1)
carbon capture and storage
(1)
carbon footprint
(5)
carbon neutrality
(1)
cheaper than coal
(8)
china
(1)
clean energy
(37)
cleaner than coal
(11)
cleantech
(29)
climate change
(2)
coal
(6)
Colorado
(204)
community solar
(4)
compost
(1)
concentrated solar power
(17)
Congress
(6)
conservation
(3)
conserve water
(2)
consumption
(1)
covered parking lots
(2)
CRES
(2)
CSP
(13)
Dan Staley
(1)
demand side management
(4)
denver
(1)
department of energy
(1)
desert
(1)
distributed power generation
(10)
DNC
(3)
DoE
(1)
doitforthechildren
(13)
Dr. Dan Arvizu
(1)
Dr. Ken Swift
(1)
Dr. Varun Rai
(1)
editorial
(5)
education
(32)
efficiency
(11)
electric automobiles
(9)
electric bike
(1)
energy
(7)
energy audit
(18)
energy efficiency
(5)
energy efficient buildings
(62)
energy efficient lighting
(3)
energy independence
(5)
energy summit
(2)
environment
(5)
EPA
(4)
ethanol
(5)
externalities
(1)
financing
(2)
food
(4)
fossil fuels
(2)
fuel cells
(3)
fuel efficiency
(3)
futility
(3)
future thinking
(18)
gasguzzlersbegone
(8)
George Orwell
(1)
geothermal
(14)
good business
(3)
good debate
(5)
good government
(79)
good thinking
(59)
grappa
(1)
green building
(1)
greengarbage
(1)
greenhouse gas
(1)
greenisgood
(15)
grid-parity
(1)
HadCRU
(1)
health
(2)
high-speed rail
(1)
Hispanic market
(1)
homegrown
(1)
hvac
(1)
hybrids
(3)
hydrogen
(4)
i heart libraries
(1)
IECC
(1)
Ignite
(2)
inaugural post
(1)
incentives
(2)
India
(1)
ingenuity
(15)
International Energy Conservation Code
(1)
interview
(3)
investment
(42)
irony
(1)
it'sabouttime
(3)
jobs
(78)
kinetic energy
(1)
Kristen Brown
(1)
law
(6)
leasing
(3)
LED
(2)
LEED certified
(3)
legislation
(7)
light emitting diode
(2)
localization
(21)
manufacturing
(4)
market forces
(2)
marketing
(1)
methane gas
(5)
MIT
(8)
moo
(1)
morality
(6)
morals
(1)
musings
(1)
NASA
(1)
natural gas
(11)
newyear
(1)
NOAA
(1)
nomoredumbpoliticians
(9)
nomorepetroleum
(11)
non-originalthought
(1)
nostalgia
(1)
NREL
(33)
nuclear
(2)
off the grid
(1)
offshore wind farm
(2)
op-ed
(11)
OPEC
(1)
peak oil
(2)
petroleumiswaytired
(8)
photovoltaics
(3)
piezoelectric
(2)
policy
(33)
poopisfuel
(4)
power plants
(9)
power purchase agreement
(1)
President Barack Obama
(11)
profitability
(3)
progressive
(2)
public transit
(1)
PV
(44)
renewable energy
(2)
renewable energy market
(1)
research
(24)
ROI
(5)
RPS
(5)
Santiago Seage
(1)
science
(23)
science is cool
(11)
Sean Ong
(1)
second generation biofuels
(5)
smart design
(5)
smart grid
(12)
solar
(65)
solar cell
(4)
solar cell efficiency
(3)
Solar Electric Light Fund
(1)
solar electric thermal
(2)
solar gardens
(3)
solar leases
(1)
solar market
(17)
solar thermal
(15)
solar water heating
(1)
speed-to-market
(2)
Steven Chu
(1)
subsidies
(11)
suddenoutbreakofcommonsense
(24)
sun is good
(47)
Superfund
(1)
sustainability
(46)
systems thinking
(1)
tax credits
(22)
technology
(6)
thin-film solar
(7)
tornado
(1)
transmission
(3)
trees
(1)
triple bottom line
(1)
United Nations
(1)
utilities
(26)
wakeupcall
(1)
water
(3)
wearewhatweeat
(5)
wecandobetter
(3)
wind
(61)
World Bank
(1)
world renewable energy forum
(7)
WREF 2012
(7)
WREF2012
(1)
zero energy
(3)
zero waste
(1)
zero-energy building
(2)
No comments:
Post a Comment